Philip Mcleod

The McLeod Report - London, Ontario

A regular commentary on civic affairs in London, Canada by journalist Philip McLeod.

Subscribe, Its Free

Name:
Email:
Anti-Spam Q: Is fire hot or cold?

Local Weather

48°
°F | °C
Clear
Humidity: 76%
Sat
Mostly Sunny
55 | 81
12 | 27
Sun
Clear
55 | 84
12 | 28
Mon
Mostly Sunny
55 | 79
12 | 26

Weekly Question

Does London need a permanent historical museum?

Follow Me On

Today`s Headlines

Friday, May 18, 2012


 

 

 

A vision for the city – by us

BLOG #596: City council has agreed with its planning department that the next Official Plan review, about to start, will be driven by Londoners’ vision for the future, not special interest groups. Let’s hope that’s a promise the politicians plan to keep.

Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2012 – London

Lest you worry the forthcoming update of London’s Official Plan will be captive of special interest groups, fear not,

“The people chosen for working groups will be one Londoner, one Londoner, one Londoner, not who they are and what they represent,” declares John Fleming, the city’s planning director.

And, for once, city council seems to agree – all, that is, save Councillor Stephen Orser who yesterday tried to talk Mr. Fleming into working groups top heavy with developers and investors, “people who will contribute more to creating jobs.”

The rest of council, and especially Mayor Joe Fontana, seemed on board for a very public, very different process that will develop land use guidelines for the next 20 years.

“I hope we can really engage our citizens,” the mayor says, “especially young people who will grow up in the city we’re planning.”

The Official Plan is the document which draws a blueprint for where and how the city will grow in the decades ahead. It’s not rigid cement – the last Official Plan update, five years ago, has already been amended almost 500 times – but neither is it a push over.

The plan must embrace provincial planning directives; it must accurately forecast development costs to spare taxpayers paying for the profit of others; it must maximize municipal services by discouraging urban sprawl.

And, this time for certain Mr. Fleming says, it must reflect citizens’ wishes for the future of their city.

Gregg Barrett, the city’s manager of land use planning policy who will be guiding the Official Plan review, promises to “really reflect citizens’ desires in the process. What we’re trying to do is bring together the community to establish what their vision is and then reflect that in the policies we propose.”

It will be a different process than other years, he says. New public engagement techniques will be deployed from the beginning.

“We usually spend a lot of time developing policy,” Mr. Barrett told council’s strategic priorities and policy committee. “This time we’re starting with the community vision.”

That’s where the working groups will come in – groups of citizens all across the city who will be engaged in grappling with specific planning problems and opportunities. The end result, Mr. Barrett hopes, will be a planning document that is more understandable and more user friendly, filled with pictures and diagrams rather than dense prose.

A couple of ticklish issues are ahead. Expansion of the urban growth boundary, which limits expansion of new suburban development, will be a key question; already the lobbying has started for big change. So will possible creation of more industrial land, especially large parcels to satisfy a major manufacturer should one ever come knocking.

As united as they were yesterday at the kick-off, council is of several minds on those two issues.

However, that’s for the future. For now, who knows what Londoners will come up with.

Yesterday Mayor Fontana was quite excited about the prospect of asking them, wondering whether some way could be found to get a questionnaire into the hands of everyone. “If asked in the proper way, maybe we could get 10 questions for every Londoner about the kind of city they really want.”

Great idea. One hopes the mayor remembers the adage, be careful what you ask for. Is council really ready for the answers?

Comments  

 
+1 #5 CEOwalter hanisch 2012-01-31 13:51
I am afraid this is just plain old whitewashing. Give the public an indication we care then as EM mentioned, placed on the shelf of dreams then the developers take over.
Quote
 
 
+1 #4 Here we go againGord 2012-01-31 13:22
Was delighted to hear about the public engagement component of the official plan review process but extremely disappointed to learn from the LFP article that once again a consultant will be hired to assist in this process. With all of those $100k plus so best of the best managers at City Hall could they not effectively manage this process? Phil why don't you look into what has been spent by City Hall on consultants the last 4 years and report this information in your blog.I am confident you will be shocked by the dollar amount or will be stonewalled by City administration in your attempts to procure this information. Don't forget the City was recently contemplating hiring a consultant at a cost of $300k to tell them how to save money.Once again it appears city staff were unable to take on this task.If a line by line review of both operating and capital budgets is to take place,I suggest consulting fees would be a great place to start.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 RE: A vision for the city – by usElaine Murray 2012-01-31 13:02
Another waste of time and money. Another useless task force to be formed to waste taxpayer money on studies and consultants, that will be put on the shelf with the rest of them. Who will be on this task force? Citizens with too much time on their hands and have no problem with wasting tax payer money on stupid stuff.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Community CitizenshipBrenda Rowe 2012-01-31 11:30
This should be easy...there should be an application for funding to complete a community project, ie: lighting a walkway, reclaiming abandoned land and turning it into a community park, establishing bike paths and hiking trails etc...the "task force" would be a group of resident property tax paying neighbours who live in the community who would write a letter of vision recommending the project ... Reforest London and The Million Tree Challenge is a good example of this process in action.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 RE: A vision for the city – by usJeanne Poole 2012-01-31 04:40
Is this going to result in yet another "task force"? We've had the Governance, Strengthening Neighbourhoods and Citizen Engagement Task Forces, for heaven's sake, lets draw on that knowledge base and spare us another catered get-together that will ultimately be ignored.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2011 JoomlaWorks Ltd.