Philip Mcleod

The McLeod Report - London, Ontario

A regular commentary on civic affairs in London, Canada by journalist Philip McLeod.

Subscribe, Its Free

Name:
Email:
Anti-Spam Q: Is fire hot or cold?

Local Weather

48°
°F | °C
Clear
Humidity: 76%
Sat
Mostly Sunny
55 | 81
12 | 27
Sun
Clear
55 | 84
12 | 28
Mon
Mostly Sunny
55 | 79
12 | 26

Weekly Question

Does London need a permanent historical museum?

Follow Me On

Today`s Headlines

Friday, May 18, 2012


 

 

 

As cities go, are we up for it?

BLOG #597: City council offers yet another example where London, now the self-described City of Opportunity, shows signs of failing to understand what its slogan actually means. Think big we can’t.

Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2012

The world is coming. The question, though, will London ever be ready for prime time?

Increasingly – at least as the answer is expressed through the words of wisdom dished out by city council – an observer is confused at best and downright pessimistic at worst.

It’s not just the ever-narrowing attitude on the part of some councillors about the 2013 World Figure Skating Championships which will be held here. It’s a growing list of examples where London, now the self-described City of Opportunity, shows signs of failing to understand what its slogan actually means.

The latest example popped up last night during a routine review at city council of the recommendations of its planning and environment committee. Down there at number 16 was this item: “Market Lane Design Competition – Winning Design Announcement.”

Market Lane, in case you’re not intimately familiar with downtown London, is a slice of open space, a walkway of sorts, that runs between Dundas Street and Covent Market Place. On its east side is a vacant building with a large brick wall. On the west side is the building Fanshawe College has purchased as phase one of its new downtown campus for theatre arts.

Whatever we think of Market Lane today – which, by all accounts, isn’t often and isn’t much – city planners see its potential as a cool gathering spot in a re-energized downtown.

As part of the overall preparations for the skating championships, city council agreed last year on a project that would make Market Lane an integral part of the triangle of restaurants-John Labatt Centre-Dundas Street that is expected to be action central for the championships and well beyond that.

The city’s commitment to the games, upwards of $3.6 million (although that point-six is in jeopardy) is to provide a lasting legacy once the skaters have gone home.

To ensure we got the biggest bang for our buck in Market Lane – the buck(s) could reach $750,000 – council approved an international design competition with a $75,000 prize. Five entries made it to the finals and Hapa Collaboration of Vancouver was chosen. You can find their very, very cool proposal here.

All that was announced weeks ago, along with a notation that the winning team would now work on the construction documents to be tendered in April, with construction to begin in July. Last night’s council agenda item was mere housecleaning, a moment to celebrate both the widespread national interest in our idea and the sophistication of the winning design.

Except sometimes there is no such thing.

One by one the naysayers began their whines. Harold Usher was worried about the brick wall on the east; what would happen to the design if someone wanted to put a door in it? (Nothing). Denise Brown was cranky about paying the winner; don’t even think about building it. (Council actually approved it last year). Stephen Orser thought it a mecca for vandalism and worried there was no place for people to have lunch or study. (Wrong, the design shows lots of such spaces). Paul Van Meerbergen was, as usual, Dr. No – “to think we’re going to spend this kind of money for an alley that is 100 feet long is preposterous.”

And that got the mayor’s dander up. “When we make a commitment as a city we need to stick to it,” he said. “Council endorsed a national competition. Our name is all over the place. We’ve already passed the budget and the project. Our credibility is becoming questionable in some circles. Our national reputation is at stake.”

Ultimately paying the winner squeaked by 8-6 with Councillors Nancy Branscombe, Matt Brown and Dale Henderson joining Councillors Denise Brown, Orser and Van Meerbergen.

Too late. Once again, given an opportunity to strut its potential as a city ready for the big time, a true city of opportunity, London chose to think parochial.

Or as Councillor Orser expressed it in Smallville terms: “My credibility with the voters (of Ward 4) is more important than someone in Vancouver.”

SKATING CHAMPIONSHIPS UPDATE – The $600,000 for a colourful light show as part of the World Figure Skating Championships, narrowly slashed from the budget by council earlier this month, has won a reprieve. Mayor Fontana succeeded in getting it referred to the finance and administration committee for another look after a plea from Tourism London.

Comments  

 
-1 #16 If you gotta ask ...Leila Paul 2012-02-02 03:00
If we have to ask how will we pay for it;

how will it affect our deficit or budget when we're not sure it will bring in more money or go sour;

or if we need to argue about who should pay for it - then the old adage apples:

We can't afford it.
Quote
 
 
0 #15 Ma and Pa's Clothes ClosetLeila Paul 2012-02-02 02:37
Uncle Joe and Aunt Cookie are coming to visit from the big city. Gosh darn, we better dig up our Sunday best an sell the milk cow to buy food so we can put on a big spread and really impress those city folk that we're just as good as them.

Oops, the Sunday best are full of patches and rips and nine stitches will not come in time to save face. Selling the cow won't bring enough money for and new clothes.

Ureka! Let's borrow more money and buy some new duds.

When Joe and Cookie come to visit, they did not even notice the new duds or fancy spuds. But Ma and Pa lost the farm to foreclosure. :(
Quote
 
 
+2 #14 Definition please?Leila Paul 2012-02-02 02:12
Nothing screams small town more than desperately trying to put on big city pretensions. Throw money around and that will make the city look big city.

What is a big city other than a town with more people. It is so outdated to be think that a small populace is isolated from global behaviours that supposedly mimic big city "cool". Just using the word cool is so juvenile when it comes out the mouths of mid-age or seniors.

Grow up. Spending money hoping people will be impressed is a sure sign of a sense of inferiority. These global skaters make the rounds of cities and London will barely be noticed. Just don't poison them. Make street signs visible and stay out of the way. That's all most who will come for this event will want. Efficiency, cleanliness, and courtesy. That does not take a fist full of money nor pretensions of grandeur.
Quote
 
 
+1 #13 RE: As cities go, are we up for it?Jeanne Poole 2012-02-01 22:40
I have worked in this area of downtown for over 25 years. A Market Lane makeover, no matter how wonderful it looks in concept, will not be a success if you don't deal with the problem issues that are prevalent in that area first. Downtown workers & shoppers avoid that lane during broad daylight for a reason and it's not because of how it looks. It's because of the beggars, the drug dealers, the people urinating against the old Shoppers building. We don't sit on the benches because there is often someone sleeping on them or there is vomit all around. Fancy lights and illuminated benches are not going to change this. Deal with the real issues first before trying to pretty things up.
Quote
 
 
0 #12 RE: As cities go, are we up for it?Oliver Hobson 2012-02-01 21:14
If the answer is 'none', then perhaps a complete cancellation of it should remain in the works as it's obviously not valued by a business community that sees no gain in it.

Perhaps council should take their hint.
Quote
 
 
+1 #11 RE: As cities go, are we up for it?Oliver Hobson 2012-02-01 21:12
This light show is corporate advertising for the City of London as much as for established local landlords and downtown business.

The proposal wasn't for 'matching funding'...and there has been no proposal for shaking the corporate trees to see what dollars are available.

All we've had is a proposition to let the tax payer foot the bill for the entire venture.

Proposals like this are good ones for sure...but not when there's such an inequitable distribution of up front costs in the current economic climate.

If you can prove that business has come to London or stays in London on the basis of a light show then you can directly link the public investment to the returns gained.

No one wants to be embarrassed internationally ...but to date...how many business (other than London City Council) have rushed to the plate in order to ensure that doesn't happen?
Quote
 
 
+2 #10 Tired of it allAndy E 2012-02-01 20:50
I grow weary of these never ending attempts to rejuvinate the downtown, or rather for the city to contibute to the wellbeing of the restaurant industry. Even Phil could only name these businesses as beneficiaries of this civic largess.
Perhaps it is time we stop fixating on the downtown and start helping out the other businees in London who get little or no support from the city and generally get stymied by municipal red tape.
Quote
 
 
0 #9 RE: As cities go, are we up for it?Wyatt Pate 2012-02-01 17:16
Some really refreshing comments on this here article. I recently read the Market Lane article on LFP's site and the commentary from Londoners is just awful. People constantly complain about how decrepit downtown is, but when ideas and projects seek to improve the core all you see are people screaming about their tax dollars. The renewal of Market Lane will be enjoyed by Londoners for years to come, and look pretty for the 2013 skating event to boot. I believe this type of targeted investment is much more effective than a wide-brush all of downtown type thing. The metal trees are a fairly good example of how underwhelming a project can be when they try to cover too large of an area. I think focusing our money on smaller places, with quality design is a winning approach.

Again, kudos to Oliver, Bill, Walter and Dean. It's nice to read opinions from people who are able to look past the numbers and can appreciate the big picture.
Quote
 
 
-2 #8 Lane Redevelopment is another step to downtown healthDean Sheppard 2012-02-01 15:26
You want a better and more vibrant downtown? Then realize its not going to fall magically from the sky. It takes step by step improvements in all corners.

London is indeed poor practised at thinking big in terms of public space.

I am delighted a Vancouver team won the competition - its a chance for some 'not the usual London'.

Ok, $600,000 sounds like a lot of money, and it is, but temper that with the fact that most people have no grasp of how much public space construction actually costs.

I look forward to one more installation that will make London's downtown more unique and more vibrant.
Quote
 
 
-2 #7 Designwalter hanisch 2012-02-01 14:50
I believe the intent was that this area can be used by all; visitors, students and Londoners alike. Fanshawe should not be asked to pay for this as it is for everyone, otherwise a sign of 'private property' might be erected. Plus what if Fanshawe moves out? We have to pay sometimes for what is good. Having Fanshawe move downtown is good enough, I think. The spinoffs alone are a plus.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2011 JoomlaWorks Ltd.