Philip Mcleod

The McLeod Report - London, Ontario

A regular commentary on civic affairs in London, Canada by journalist Philip McLeod.

Subscribe, It's Free

Anti-Spam Q: Is fire hot or cold?
Name:
Email:

Local Weather

London, Canada

Current Conditions:
Clear
10oC
Clear
Wind Direction Degree: 70
Precip: 0.0 mm

Recent Entries

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 19, 2013

Follow Me On

Time for young London to walk the talk

BLOG #674: In a city which seeks to retain young people, only one of the 15 members of city council is younger than 40; five of them are older than 60. It’s not that older people are incapable of making good decisions but council is not reflective of the kind of city our leaders say we need to become.

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

For a city which wants so desperately to retain young people, city council certainly is not reflective of the demographic. Of the 15 elected members, only one can be considered part of the young potential leadership of this community – Matt Brown in Ward 7.

Not that age should be any barrier to public office but five members, including Mayor Joe Fontana, are over age 60; the rest are in their late 40s and 50s. Baby boomers all, except for young Mr. Brown.

Meantime, though, this council has continued the resolution of the last one in trying to encourage young Londoners both to choose this city as their permanent home and to get involved in public affairs.

In fact, council has actively tried to find ways young people can assume leadership positions on the various boards and commissions to which it makes appointments. But making room for them in the Big House? Not so accommodating.

Council’s efforts to attract and retain young people are largely funnelled through an organization called Emerging Leaders which fosters “retention, development and engagement of emerging talent as a means to a more vibrant, inclusive and dynamic London community for the future.”

Although not officially affiliated with the city, Emerging Leaders has acted as a conduit to placing young people under age 40 on various non-profit boards. And if you have an opening, right now the organization has dozens of responsible, educated and energetic young leaders keen to help you out.

There are other groups, less well organized but just as keen to be recognized. All of them share a fondness for and an expertise in social media. That’s both a blessing and a curse.

On the plus side, most of them pack a digital contact list that can draw a crowd with less than 140 key strokes. On the downside, though, the resulting gathering is more likely to want to chug designer beer and talk about how hard it is to break through in London than to do anything about it.

This is the long way around describing an event that took place Tuesday night at the Morrissey House, a bar on Dundas St. near Waterloo. Headlined as a night of Pints and Politics, it drew a crowd of 30 or so young people (and a few old farts like myself and Glen Pearson) to drink and debate what’s up with London.

The cause of the day is citizen engagement. It just so happens that Mr. Pearson, former controller and fellow blogger Gina Barber, and I are part of a presentation on the subject Thursday, May 24, 7 p.m., Wolf Performance Hall at the Central Library. Free admission.

That plug out of the way, the conversation at the table I shared turned to how voters can ensure city council understands and delivers on citizen engagement. You have to vote out those council members who aren’t with the program. And that would certainly start with providing some age appropriate company for Councillor Matt.

Many of the current council gang started their political careers in their 30s. Seven of them have served longer than two terms; Bud Polhill of Ward 1 has been on council for more than 25 years.

This doesn’t suggest for a moment older Londoners are incapable of making appropriate decisions in critical situations. What it does suggest is that a city which craves an image as a young, hip, with it community needs to walk the talk.

Naheed Nenshi, a fresh political face and now the mayor of Calgary, a city three times our size and chock full of energy, just turned 40; our mayor, a former city councillor and long-time member of Parliament, just turned 62.

But Emerging Leaders and their many unofficial like-minded social mediums shouldn’t expect to move to the Big House simply by standing around thumbing their Blackberries or fingering their iPhones.

Winning elections is a grinding exercise; it’s time for London’s next generation to holster the smart phones and start knocking on doors rather than sit around quaffing pints talking about it.

UPDATE ON THE MAYOR’S EXPENSES – City Clerk Cathy Saunders said late Tuesday she has no current plans to issue a corrected version of the mayor’s 2011 expenses. Jennifer Buchanan, the mayor’s executive assistant, says she will have a corrected version available before next Tuesday’s council meeting “and I will ask the clerk to approve them.”

Comments   

 
#8 RE: Time for young London to walk the talkJosh Morgan 2012-05-28 16:50
Good column Phil. I’ve had some interesting experiences in being both “young” and “active” in our city. In 2005 when I joined my local Optimist Club I was the youngest member at age 27. A year later I became the youngest member of the London Public Library Board, and the year after the youngest member of the Western Fair Association Fair Directors. Now 34, I am still one of the youngest on each of these. The challenge, particularly with charitable organizations dependent on volunteers to raise money for their causes, is how to motivate the younger generations to join up and help out. Without them, service groups will continue to age and their ability to contribute to the most needy in our society will be diminished. Again, good column Phil!
Quote
 
 
-3 #7 Different personalitiesLeila Paul 2012-05-16 22:37
Best thing about Joe Fontana is Jennifer Buchanan. She's a gem.

Least desirable characteristics of London city staff eloquently personified in Cathy Saunders.
Quote
 
 
+1 #6 Youth and EngagementDavid Dimitrie 2012-05-16 20:00
I went to the ChangeLondon Engagement Camp at Museum London a few weeks back. It was an interesting and worthwile exercise. However I found myself in a really curious spot at a table talking about "youth volunteerism." I like to volunteer. I shared my experiences and related them to youth. Unfortunately, one young man rolled his eyes and the group leader simply said "youth are looking for some sexy volunteer opportunities." I guess selling raffle tickets at a sporting event for disadvantaged kids didn't count. I'm only 49 but I feel like there is a wide gulf between those considered "youth" and old farts like me who still remember the moon launch. I have volunteered in 5 or 6 campaigns in my life doing grunt work. I feel good that I got involved. I learned that winning is very hard and is mostly up to factors out of your control. Phil, is the group of people your aiming for really willing to do what it takes to get involved? I don't think so.
Quote
 
 
-8 #5 RE: Time for young London to walk the talkElaine Murray 2012-05-16 18:04
I don't think the "I want," generation is capable of leading anything you would want to see happen. Do you see future leaders in Quebec University students,or any future University students?

I think you have to have a good solid grasp on where the money is coming from for all those wants. They haven't a clue. The rights without responsibility generation need a world war, or something of that magnitude to give them a lesson in real life.
Quote
 
 
+4 #4 RE: Time for young London to walk the talkAdri Medina 2012-05-16 16:04
How about "fresh new capable and more socially, fiscally and environmentally responsible minds" maybe those will accomplish more that the 'old, tired, and totally the opposite than above' kind of councillors. Good examples we have here in North America like Cory Booker or Naheed Nenshi, wonderful mayors who fully engage their constituents at different levels and have created a dynamic and "make it happen" kind of interactive approach to constituents needs. As a Londoner I do not need my council member to 'silence my voice', or give me a run around response to my questions regarding a better ward, and a better quality of life here in London for me and for my family.
Quote
 
 
+4 #3 RE: Time for young London to walk the talkChris Moss 2012-05-16 13:28
I agree with the concept of new leaders and hope for a fresh council in 2014. I believe; however, that those who have extensive knowledge of council from years of practice have a lot they could share. I also believe that it is their duty to prepare for the next election by humbly taking a step down, announce they will coach new leaders by teaching them the ropes, and stand behind them through their campaigns to get them standing strong. This wouldn't mean that new leaders would have to agree with "old" politics, but learning about the logistics of council will help them feel supported and through that more young people may choose to run in 2014.
Quote
 
 
#2 Clerical errorsmisfit 2012-05-16 12:15
sorry I should have written change of information not chance of information.
Quote
 
 
#1 Clerical errorsmisfit 2012-05-16 12:12
re: "City Clerk Cathy Saunders said late Tuesday she has no current plans to issue a corrected version of the mayor’s 2011 expenses."
From what I know, due to personal experience, the governments clerical computer systems aren't programmed to correct mistakes. It costs money. First you have to apply for a chance of information and the request needs to be approved and then the fee has to be paid before the computer will allow a change...so if the clerk makes a mistake spelling someones name wrong for instance, the clerk has to pay the fee, and often times they don't. They blame the error on someone else, and the ombudsman won't even help with that.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh